Making Choices about Evaluation Design in times of COVID-19: A Decision Tree

Adapting Evaluation Designs in Times of COVID-19 (Coronavirus): Four Questions to Guide Decisions

This is a framework organized around four questions to address the ethical, conceptual, and methodological challenges that are affecting programmatic evaluation work during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The questions are:

Should you adapt your evaluation questions and scope?
Can you improve what remains feasible?
Can you find ways around what is infeasible?
Can you tap into alternative sources of evidence?

Source: Adapting Evaluation Designs in Times of COVID-19 (Coronavirus): Four Questions to Guide Decisions

Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs

This website is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) under the Breakthrough ACTION Cooperative Agreement #AID-OAA-A-17-00017. Breakthrough ACTION is based at Johns Hopkins Center for Communication Programs (CCP).The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of Breakthrough ACTION and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID, the United States Government, or Johns Hopkins University.

STAY UPDATED